Disclaimer: i'm not usually introspective out loud, so if you are expecting a typical rant about one thing or another (i.e. Ohio weather or the Counting Crows), you'll have to wait for another post.
are we the sum of the stories we tell? do the stories we choose to tell define who we are? are the stories we choose not to tell the summation of who we choose not to be? i think that the stories we choose not to tell are the ones that influence us more than any others.
When we tell our stories, we usually know the kind of response we want from the person we are telling. So we manipulate our stories, highlighting different parts to elicit a response from our audience. My friend Seth taught me the art of telling a good story. He could find the interesting in the mundane. For him, it seemed the goal of a good story was to engage the audience, and if you could make the reader/listener fall out of her chair from laughing after a horrific day, so much the better.
but sometimes we have to tell stories that aren't so funny. No one is sliding down a hill on her stomach after a rollerblading incident, no one is walking into street signs, or getting obsure diagnoses from the school nurse. sometimes the story we need to tell is about the person who isn't here anymore, or about the time we messed up, or the person we hurt, or the time we succeeded, or the time we just felt alive for no reason at all. these stories don't make people laugh. most of the time they don't elicit any reaction we would want from our audience. they are met with pity, laughter, scorn, or indifference. so we tuck these stories away, writing them in journals or typing them out on blogs when they will no longer be containted, but seldom saying them out loud.
stories stand for experiencesi've been thinking a lot about how our experiences shape us, regardless of whether or not we intend to let them. i've spent a lot of the last 6 years trying to remain the same, unimpacted by the joy or pain that i've experienced. i've believed that independence and validation are found in being untouchable and unchanged. when i had to tell my stories about loss, i had no answer to the question "how did that impact you?" except to say that i kept going, i tried not to forget and not to remember, i found new projects, new causes, new distractions, and new ways to stay the same, to not let anyone around me see the fractures or changes that were forming in me for better or for worse. if loss has changed me for the better, i've pushed that change aside, rejecting it on principle. if loss has changed me for the worse, i've denied its influnce, going on to be the person i thought everyone thought that i was.
the same goes for joy. as much as i've tried to deny the influence of negative experiences on who i am, i have also rejected the influence of happy or pleasurable experiences. to allow myself to be molded by the experience of being loved is as much a terror as to admit defeat and insecurity and loss in the deepest core of my being.
the importance of remembering
i think that we sometimes forget that we are creating new stories every day. next week, next month, next year, what are the stories we will be adding to our repitoire? if the stories i tell are about the stupid things i do, then i need to keep doing stupid things to make sure i have new stories. if my stories i tell are about the people i love, then i need to keep loving people. if my stories are about my successes, then i need to keep being successful.
i want my stories to be about living. living encompasses mistakes, successes, love and loss, failure, joy, and happiness and sadness. that's easier said that done. it's so easy to get caught up in everything and nothing. i know it's the right answer, but i don't know what it means.